Tom Cedoz

Checklist · Cross-practice

Litigation Hold: Trigger to Release

A litigation hold needs timely notice, clear instructions for IT, and follow-up with the people who hold records. Use this checklist from the duty to preserve through the decision to release the hold.

Updated September 2026· Full lifecycle· Prints to 2 pages

1. Recognize the trigger

The duty to preserve attaches when litigation is reasonably foreseeable — almost always earlier than teams assume, and well before anything is filed. Treat each of these as a presumptive trigger:

  • A demand letter or lawyer letter, received or sent — the duty runs both ways
  • An agency charge or complaint (EEOC, OSHA, state equivalents)
  • A serious internal complaint, or an incident with injuries or significant loss
  • A credible threat of suit, even verbal — “you’ll hear from my attorney” counts more often than not
  • Your own decision to pursue a claim against someone else

2. Scope it in one sitting

3. Catch the sources teams forget

4. Send a notice people can follow

5. Keep it alive

6. Release it on purpose

Why the formality matters

In federal court, for electronically stored information, the serious sanctions — adverse-inference instructions, dismissal — generally require intent under Rule 37(e). State courts in Michigan (MCR 2.313(D)) and Ohio (Civ.R. 37(E)) apply the same standard, and digital video counts as electronically stored information. The standard for physical items is less forgiving — negligence or gross negligence can be enough — so confirm the rule in your forum. Either way, what turns an honest IT oversight into something that looks like intent is the absence of process: no timely notice, no suspension ticket, no acknowledgments, no reminders. The paper trail isn’t bureaucracy; it is the defense.