Before the offer goes out
Ask whether the candidate is bound by anything — and get the documents. Non-compete, non-solicit (customer and employee), confidentiality and invention-assignment agreements, plus any equity or bonus clawbacks. Candidates routinely underestimate what they signed. Read the actual paper, not the recollection.
Assess enforceability for this role, in this state. Whether a covenant binds turns on its scope, the employee’s role, the consideration given, and the jurisdiction — and this is an area in real flux, with several states narrowing or banning non-competes and the FTC, though its nationwide ban was vacated, still challenging overbroad ones case by case. Confirm against the current rule rather than assuming the agreement is either ironclad or worthless. See Restrictive Covenant Review .
Map the covenant to the job you are actually offering. Risk concentrates where the new role overlaps the old one — same customers, same territory, same product line, same team. A title change does not cure overlap; the work does.
Decide the risk question before you fall in love with the candidate. Some hires are worth a fight; some are worth a tailored role; a few are not worth the exposure at all. Make that call while you can still walk away, narrow the duties, or route it to counsel.
Set the rules in writing — before day one
Verbal instructions do not survive discovery. The clean-hands posture has to exist on paper, dated before the new hire has access to anything.
Instruct, in writing, not to bring or retain the former employer’s information. No files, no customer or pricing lists, no source code, no decks, no contact databases — nothing physical or electronic, and nothing sitting in a personal email account, cloud drive, phone, or thumb drive. The rule is return, not delete and not “keep just in case”: anything found is left unopened and reported to counsel, who arranges its return or a documented forensic remediation.
Instruct not to use or disclose the former employer’s confidential information — including from memory. General skill and experience travel with the employee; specific confidential and trade-secret information does not. Say so explicitly, so the line is the company’s and not the new hire’s to guess.
Instruct not to solicit in violation of a valid covenant. If an enforceable non-solicit covers customers or coworkers, the new hire stays off those names for its duration. Where a covenant is narrow or unenforceable, say what is permitted — silence invites the employee to guess wrong.
Tell the new hire not to recruit former colleagues on the company’s behalf. A team “lift-out” is the fact pattern that turns a single departure into a coordinated-raid claim — and reframes the company from bystander to architect.
Shape the role to lower the exposure
Get the acknowledgment and document a clean start
Higher-risk situations
Route close calls to counsel before extending the offer. An enforceable-looking covenant, a senior or customer-facing role, a direct competitor, or a multi-person move — any one of these is worth a privileged look before commitments are made.
Consider proactive notice to the former employer. In the right case, a measured letter — confirming the new hire’s scope, that no confidential information was taken, and that any valid covenant will be honored — can set a cooperative tone and defuse a dispute before it forms. It is a judgment call: it also puts the other side on notice, so weigh it with counsel.
Have a forensic plan ready if a threat lands. Preserve devices and accounts, suspend deletion, and resist the instinct to “just check” what the new hire brought — that is for counsel and a neutral examiner to handle, not the manager.
Set the no-documents rule before day one
Trade-secret suits against a new employer are almost always built from the new hire’s own first-week emails and downloads — the forwarded contact list, the “just my own files” upload. The protection is to set the no-documents rule in writing before the start date, not to explain it after the complaint arrives.